By votelouisville on November 13, 2019
LOUISVILLE, Ky. (WDRB) – Bekaert, a global manufacturing company based in Belgium, will lay off 100 workers on Jan. 13 at its Shelbyville, Ky. plant …
These days, Lamar Jackson and Deshaun Watson are widely known as two of the NFL’s best quarterbacks. But back in college, they were linked through the 2016 Heisman Trophy race — in which the pair finished 1-2 in the voting results. Jackson took home the hardware, though Watson expressed his disagreement with that result at the time.
“I’m the best player in the country,” Watson said a week after the Heisman ceremony. “That’s how I think. That’s how I feel.”
Watson backed up his talk in his college finale by leading Clemson to a historic championship-game upset of an Alabama team that was one of the best ever, while Jackson lost his final two bowl appearances. But plenty also has gone down in the years since — including each QB going in the first round of the NFL Draft, Watson’s injury comeback with the Texans and Jackson’s rapid development with the Ravens in this, his second pro campaign.
There’s no doubt that both QBs are near the top of the NFL’s pecking order right now. According to our QB Elo ratings, which judge signal-callers based on a rolling average of their (schedule-adjusted) passing and rushing performances, Watson is the second-best quarterback in the league behind only Kansas City’s Patrick Mahomes, while Jackson slides in at fourth behind Dallas’s Dak Prescott:
|Rank||Quarterback||Team||Starts||Avg Start*||Elo Rating (vs. Avg)|
Watson’s higher rating is due in large part to his play in the first half of the year — but also because he went into the season with one of the top QB Elo ratings. (He was mashed between Tom Brady and Carson Wentz in last year’s final rankings, which mostly carry over to the following season.) Watson has been doing this for a while, ever since he exploded onto the scene as a rookie in 2017 with the fifth-best stretch of six starts to begin a career by any QB since 1950.<a class="espn-footnote-link" data-footnote-id="1" href="https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/deshaun-watson-and-lamar-jackson-were-college-rivals-now-theyre-taking-it-to-the-pros/#fn-1" data-footnote-content="
Before he got hurt, Watson averaged an Elo performance 114 points above average in his first six starts, which ranks behind only Kurt Warner (+171), Elvis Grbac (+149), Robert Griffin III (+147) and Mahomes (+124).
As for Jackson, his average per-start Elo performance actually has been better than Watson’s (or anyone not named “Mahomes”) so far this season, even though he is slightly behind Watson rating-wise. That’s because Jackson started the season with an extremely low rating — 40 Elo points below average — which ranked 29th out of 32 opening-day starting QBs. Jackson has thoroughly exceeded those expectations, though. His 2019 ranks as one of the most improved first halves to a season by any QB since 1950, according to Elo:
|QB Elo vs. Avg.|
|Season||Quarterback||Team||Preseason||Thru 9 Starts||Change|
Because of Watson’s ongoing greatness and Jackson’s rapid improvement, the two QBs are essentially playing at the same high level — just in time to face off in the best QB showdown of the week, if not the entire season.<a class="espn-footnote-link" data-footnote-id="2" href="https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/deshaun-watson-and-lamar-jackson-were-college-rivals-now-theyre-taking-it-to-the-pros/#fn-2" data-footnote-content="
When we broke down the original Watson-vs.-Jackson Heisman debate, we concluded that the difference between the two largely came down to a matter of preference: Do you want the more consistent passer (Watson), or the more threatening runner (Jackson)? Perhaps unsurprisingly, the same has held true in this year’s comparison.
According to ESPN’s Total Quarterback Rating data, Watson ranks second behind Seattle’s Russell Wilson in pure passing expected points added (EPA) this season, while Jackson ranks a more modest 15th out of 32 qualified QBs. Watson has the superior completion percentage relative to expectation (per NFL Next Gen Stats), the better completion percentage into “tight windows” of coverage, the lower rate of off-target throws and a slightly lower rate of interceptions as well. While Jackson is averaging slightly more air yards per throw, the metrics generally suggest that Watson remains the more sophisticated passer at this stage.
|Player||Pass EPA||Air Yds/Pass||On Target%||Comp% vs Exp.||Tight Comp%||Sack%||Rush EPA|
But at the same time, Jackson has essentially made up the difference with his rushing ability, leading all QBs in EPA on the ground with 60 percent more value added than Watson, the next-highest ranked rushing QB. That’s why Jackson has a slightly better Total QBR than Watson so far this season, despite the latter’s edge in passing production.
But the razor-thin margin between the two — whether in QBR or Elo — basically brings us back to where we started with these two back in 2016, when they were college rivals in a dead heat. Back then, Jackson won the Heisman but Watson won the only head-to-head battle between the two as starters. Now they’ll get to face off again in the pros, in another clash of quarterbacking styles — and another chance to settle who is truly the best.
Looking Ahead: Week 11
Best matchup:<a class="espn-footnote-link" data-footnote-id="3" href="https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/deshaun-watson-and-lamar-jackson-were-college-rivals-now-theyre-taking-it-to-the-pros/#fn-3" data-footnote-content="
“>3 No. 1 New England (-2) at No. 10 Philadelphia, 4:25 p.m. ET Sunday
In terms of pure matchup quality, Sunday afternoon’s Patriots–Eagles tilt — a rematch of Super Bowl LII — is the best of the week. The Patriots are coming off a humbling 37-20 loss to Jackson and the Ravens before last week’s bye; it was the first time an opposing QB and offense had really exposed the Pats’ defense all season. It also opens up questions about how much of New England’s early-season dominance was the product of a weak schedule that gets much tougher over the next four weeks.<a class="espn-footnote-link" data-footnote-id="4" href="https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/deshaun-watson-and-lamar-jackson-were-college-rivals-now-theyre-taking-it-to-the-pros/#fn-4" data-footnote-content="
Jackson was the first QB with an above-average pregame Elo rating that New England had faced since Ben Roethlisberger in Week 1.
“>4 Still, the Pats have the most efficient (schedule-adjusted) defense in the league, and they still have Tom Brady to face an up-and-down Eagles squad that hasn’t impressed when tasked with shutting down good QBs this season. Philly pulled out of its October crisis with back-to-back wins and has a prime opportunity to pounce on Dallas’s loss to Minnesota and solidify its NFC East odds with a win here. Still, despite the game being played at The Linc — where the Philly Special is immortalized in statue form outside the stadium — we give the Eagles only a 43 percent chance of replicating that Super Bowl win and knocking off the Pats here.
|Favorite||Underdog||Favorite’s Win prob||Quality||Evenness||Importance||QBs|
Biggest playoff implications: No. 17 Indianapolis (-1) vs. No. 14 Jacksonville, 1 p.m. ET Sunday
Potential shift in playoff odds: 30.9 total percentage points
The AFC South has basically owned this section of the column this year, and Week 11 is no exception. This time, the crucial battle sees the Jaguars traveling to Indy to face the Colts in a game that could break the loser’s entire season. Indianapolis went from sitting pretty with a 5-2 record three weeks ago to a team whose playoff chances are in serious peril — and whose starting QB (Jacoby Brissett) has an unclear status for Week 11. Meanwhile, the Jags are potentially dangerous — despite sitting a game behind the Colts in the standings — with No. 1 QB Nick Foles returning from a collarbone injury that kept him sidelined since Week 1. We all loved the mustachioed magic of Minshew Mania, but QB Elo thinks Foles will make Jacksonville more competitive from now on, provided there aren’t too many residual effects from his injury. In terms of the stakes in this game, neither team can boost its playoff chances to any higher than 48 percent with a win, but whoever loses will see its odds become quite remote: If Indy falls, it will have only a 15 percent playoff probability, while Jacksonville’s number would dip to 7 percent with a loss.
Best QB duels: No. 2 Deshaun Watson (HOU) vs. No. 4 Lamar Jackson (BAL); No. 1 Patrick Mahomes (KC) vs. No. 17 Philip Rivers (LAC); No. 8 Tom Brady (NE) vs. No. 13 Carson Wentz (PHI)
FiveThirtyEight vs. the Readers
As a weekly tradition here at FiveThirtyEight, we look at how our Elo model did against everybody who made picks in our forecasting game. (If you entered, you can find yourself on our leaderboard here. I am currently in 407th place!) These are the games in which Elo made its best — and worst — predictions against the field last week:
|OUR PREDICTION (ELO)||READERS’ PREDICTION|
|PICK||WIN PROB.||PICK||WIN PROB.||Result||READERS’ NET PTS|
|SF||68%||SF||59%||SEA 27, SF 24||+8.6|
|DAL||54||DAL||51||MIN 28, DAL 24||+0.9|
|BAL||86||BAL||89||BAL 49, CIN 13||-0.8|
|NO||88||NO||89||ATL 26, NO 9||-3.3|
|OAK||51||LAC||51||OAK 26, LAC 24||-3.4|
|GB||71||GB||69||GB 24, CAR 16||-3.6|
|LAR||60||LAR||62||PIT 17, LAR 12||-4.3|
|IND||80||IND||82||MIA 16, IND 12||-4.9|
|KC||64||KC||68||TEN 35, KC 32||-6.9|
|TB||64||TB||57||TB 30, ARI 27||-7.6|
|CLE||50||BUF||56||CLE 19, BUF 16||-8.0|
|NYJ||63||NYG||53||NYJ 34, NYG 27||-16.5|
|CHI||81||CHI||53||CHI 20, DET 13||-21.6|
In picking against our Elo algorithm, it was kind of a rough week for the readers. The only big win against the computer was a smart hedge against the 49ers, who lost to Seattle in a classic battle Monday night. Otherwise, there were a lot more games like Jets-Giants and Browns-Bills, in which the readers paid for disagreeing with the model. And there was a bit of bad luck involved, too — Elo was able to crush the field by knowing Sunday morning that Matthew Stafford would miss Detroit’s game against the Bears. (Presumably, many readers failed to circle back and change their picks.) Overall, Elo won by an average margin of 71.4 points — a season high that was good for the model’s sixth-straight winning week.
Congratulations are in order, though, to Benjamin Thornton, who led all readers in Week 10 with 51.5 points — it was a notably low-scoring week, thanks to so many bizarre results — and to Aaron DiGenova, who once again leads the full-season contest with 674.7 points. Thanks to everyone who played — and if you haven’t, be sure to get in on the action! You can make picks now and try your luck against Elo, even if you missed Week 10.
Check out our latest NFL predictions.
When immigrants move to the United States, their professional certifications don’t always transfer over. One Louisville nonprofit is offering small loans to help former doctors, nurses and others overcome the financial obstacles preventing them from pursuing their professions in their new home.
Ricardo Gonzalez moved to Louisville from San Juan, Puerto Rico, earlier this year after meeting a Puerto Rican woman who has lived here for decades. He was previously a real estate developer, attorney and U.S. government contractor in Puerto Rico.
“I moved to Louisville not only for love, but also for the stable economy,” he told a group of supporters Tuesday at an event for LHOME, a local nonprofit Community Development Financial Institution, which is providing loans to people like Gonzalez.
Puerto Rico is an American territory, but Gonzalez needs to study for and pass the Kentucky bar exam to practice law here.
When he came to Louisville, he got a real estate license but said he could not afford to pay for bar review courses and the test itself, until he got a loan from LHOME’s JobUp! program. He is one of three people to receive a loan since the program launched in October, according to LHOME. The JobUp! program is funded by Fifth Third Bank and provides loans up to $6,000.
LHOME CEO and president Amy Shir said the loans her organization provides are below market-rate, and that specific rates vary.
Mayor Greg Fischer spoke in support of the program at an announcement event, where he said most of Louisville’s population growth comes from foreign-born residents.
“Many of these immigrants come with tremendous skills from their home countries. They can be doctors and nurses, engineers,” he said. “But when they come to America, those skills don’t translate to what the American outline is.”
LHOME provides loan services to low- to moderate-income individuals, particularly in west and south Louisville. The organization also helps some people pay their property tax bills.
The days and weeks following an election are traditionally a time when bad campaign blood is forgotten, when winners and losers alike extol the value of democracy, when we put down the partisan pitchforks and our newly elected leaders promise to serve everyone, not just those who voted for them. In the case of close elections, it can sometimes be appropriate to delay those necessary healing steps and take a closer look at the vote totals. In exceedingly rare cases, it can be appropriate to challenge an election’s results, when there is hard evidence of crime, vote fraud or illegal manipulation of the results. It is never acceptable to sow doubts about the democratic process for political or personal reasons.
Monday is Veterans Day, honoring those who have served in the military. It’s also Armistice Day, marking the official end of World War I and WFPL will air two special programs to commemorate the holiday.
World War I presented civilization with unprecedented violence and destruction. The shock of the first modern, “industrial” war extended far into the 20th century and even into the 21st, and changed how people saw the world and themselves. And that was reflected in the cultural responses to the war – which included a burgeoning obsession with beauty and body image, the birth of jazz, new thinking about the human psyche, the Harlem Renaissance, Surrealism…and more.
WNYC’s Sara Fishko and guests sift through the lingering effects of the Great War on modern art and life in Shell Shock 1919: How the Great War Changed Culture.
Guests include Jon Batiste, Ann Temkin, David Lubin, Philipp Blom, Jay Winter, Ana Carden-Coyne, Sabine Rewald, David Levering Lewis, Emma Chambers, Marion von Osten, Emily Bernard, and Gail Stavitsky.
Then, on Monday, November 11 at 8 p.m., we’ll air a rebroadcast of State of the Re:Union all about veterans:
“The wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are sending our veterans home with wounds and obstacles not always clearly visible to the rest of the country. These two current wars also illuminate how veterans of previous eras are still trying to come home years after returning from war. In this episode, State of the Re:Union explores how veterans are serving each other after they come back home from serving the country.”